| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 14 post(s) |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
15
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 19:09:00 -
[1] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:Caliph Muhammed wrote:CCP Arkanon wrote:As before, any suspicion of developer misconduct can be reported to Internal Affairs via email or petition. Our email is [email protected]That said, please note that we'll need something to go on, an event or character to look into. It's too common that we receive complaints which are based on a gut feeling, that can't be followed up on. To play devil's advocate here, the likelyhood of an outsider dealing with the effect of misconduct ever being able to provide proof is almost impossible. It would always be at best a gut feeling. Anyone inside of an alliance, particularly a multi thousand man alliance with the ability to use a CCP insider for information, reaping the benefits would be foolish to come forward with proof. I mean who inside of the Swarm would risk the permanent wrath of those thousands of people permanently in EVE? What proof could even they provide unless they were hands on with the scam? If one man claimed such and 7999 claimed otherwise whos really going to win? If 8000 people told ccp drop the investigation or we will all quit and cost you millions what's really going to happen? I have faith in CCP to handle things I suppose, but an incident has happened in the past, not a minor one either. There are valid points being made. To play real guy in the real world here I typically don't formulate any kind of a conclusion unless there's some evidence that this conclusion actually exists. I certainly wouldn't toss about disparaging claims (some might say slanderous) about individual's honesty or ability to perform their job based on what my "gut" told me about someone I'd never met and knew only as a vague figure over the internet. I certainly wouldn't make an accusatory thread based on those "gut" feelings in a place of record either, but hey we all march to the beat of our own drums I suppose. :edit: Go to your local police station and tell them your gut's telling you something fishy's going on with the local government. Make a really angry post on the internet about how they're part of the grand conspiracy when they explain to you that they can't help you because you've given them nothing to go on.
I love you Sreegs, come back and talk to us. |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
15
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 19:21:00 -
[2] - Quote
Vxrasa wrote:CCP Sreegs: He is in your thread, controlling your game, having weird mind-sex with your mother. Like a fat Lucifer, he dons the mighty Air-man costume of drunken fanfest presentations and proceeds to spew forth light and glory on all of thy posts.
I heard he wasn't fat anymore, because Icelandic food is gross. |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
17
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 21:49:00 -
[3] - Quote
This whole thread, and the other one about Soundwave, are both stupid and really, really need to be locked. |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
17
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 22:13:00 -
[4] - Quote
ModeratedToSilence wrote:Read Op. Read pages 1-4, laughed at how quickly thread was derailed to be about one group of players decided to post my views without reading any more hopla. If this idea/concept has already been placed in this thread please forgive me.
I believe that every major alliance should have a CCP "spy". This "spy" would be a CCP employee who would contact the CEO of the alliance and then be accepted as a bottom line member. The Alliance CEO would be subject to an NDA with breach of the NDA resulting in the Alliance being disbanded.
This would grant CCP: Eyes and ears on what game play is really like. The ability to see game bugs and exploits earlier than is currently possible. Make live increasingly difficult for any alliance member who has ties with other CCP employees, (eg CSM members, CCP employees, etc etc) to influence the game purely for the benefit of their own alliance.
They already have this. It's called Internal Affairs and watches over the accounts of all CCP Employees. |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
17
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 01:22:00 -
[5] - Quote
Ejit wrote:Reduce the alliance headcount to a maximum of say 1000.
Because this certainly worked well last time. |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
17
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 01:25:00 -
[6] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Doctor Ungabungas wrote:Mr Kidd wrote:Enforcement of employee misconduct would be much easier to detect for everyone concerned if devs were forced to play with their Dev accounts or tagged toons where non-tagged alts were explicitly prohibited. It's not so much that I want devs to miss out on the fun in game like others here are suggesting. But, how the **** do you detect a dev playing on an otherwise anonymous toon who has the intelligence to never identify himself as a dev, at least not to those players who don't directly benefit from his presence?
Are you high? Do you really think that devs being forced to play with dev tags on would somehow lead to less people seeking 'dev favours' than devs being forced to play on totally anonymous alts without ties to any alliance leadership. That suggests a total lack of understanding of human nature right there. CCP knows who the dev alts are, and I would expect that every aspect of their gameplay is being constantly scrutinised by Internal Affairs. What possible benefit could your proposal add over that? It's called voice chat.
This is not a proposal. This is a blurb. A blurb contains no substantial information. |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
22
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 03:24:00 -
[7] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:It used to be BOB and now it is goons, it is also their game. So you can't really do anything about it. That is the final answer TBH. P.S.Quote: :edit: And by basis we presume actual real activity or such to point at not the findings of your local tarot card reader or your own psychic gifts.
Dear Mr Dev, you might be surprised by how much (some of us) actually know. Passing secrets at RL BBQ's FTW.
I'm not surprised at all by how much you know.
Hint: It rhymes with "nothing" |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
22
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 03:37:00 -
[8] - Quote
Nick Bison wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:... (some might say slanderous) ... Salnder is spoken. Liable is written. Sorry, couldn't resist.  Side note/request: is there someplace I can mine tinfoil in Eve? Would be a serious ISK maker.
It's spelled Slander and Libel. |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
26
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 05:53:00 -
[9] - Quote
Lucius Chernikova wrote:Tippia wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Absolutely.
Dev corpses = best corpses. GǪnot to mention dev wrecks with special dev equipment loot = best wrecks and loot.  I host and develop for my own tiny non-eve server on my free-time. As a developer, reading this thread concerns me, because playing developers is always a fine line. I feel that having developers play is an essential part of the development experience. Some games separate that with a test server, but for eve that's not really viable. When I play my own game, I go with 100% legitimacy and transparency (IE: I make the character the same way a player would, grind it up, and work it. For devs here I suppose they could set account "research time" for how long they've been working here, or keep prior accounts if they had one, maybe start with one BS or lower class ship with "normal" rigging), absolutely >NO< spawned items, and for my server, I implemented a tool to allow players to brown-nose my characters (which I am 100% clear and transparent are mine), if they so pleased. Players see what i'm doing and what i'm making items-wise on my real character, but it's not a huge problem overall, just makes things a little more challenging if I play (balances dev-knowledge a little, if anything), and re-assures people there is no "dev loot" to be had, and all of what my characters have is 'real'. If i'm just testing something, I use a separate Non-active char (no guild(corp), can't interact with players in any way, just to make sure "X" quest works and whatnot.) Obviously I would never reboot the servers or kick players/etc for my 'real' account's benefit. I feel if the Devs here are running 100% illegitimate characters with spawned items there may well be an issue worth looking into, and maybe setting some *ADDITIONAL* and public rules for. I find it >INCREDIBLY< unlikely that a game like this doesn't have logs for GM actions (IE: kicks, spawned items, created characters, etc), and it might be worthwhile to have those public (I have one and it has little commentary about what an item's for if I spawn it on a non level 0 immortal GM character- takes me an extra second or so), or at least to have the logs monitored by someone impartial. Just my 2c.
The Dev characters that don't have CCP in front of them play the game just like everyone else does. The only thing they do get is a lifetime sub to the game.
Now, the characters with CCP in front of them, those are the characters that use special ships and everything, but they aren't really used for competitions and stuff, they're mostly there to keep the peace in certain situations, or to just observe goings on or whatever. |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
50
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 17:14:00 -
[10] - Quote
Sigurd Sig Hansen wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:
I believe the proper reply here is to inform you that no we do not expect you to have magical powers to detect developers playing within alliances. Nobody ever stated such. That is audited by IA. What we do expect is that if you are going to make allegations you have some basis for making them.
Ah, you mean like **********? Or should I say Kugu since even his name is still banned from the forums six years later. Cause youre SO interested in those facts Brooks Puuntai wrote:I hope that people realize that while to us Eve is a game, to those who work at CCP its a job and what pays their bills. After T20 I highly doubt many Devs would risk going to great lengths to manipulate the game in their favor at the risk of their job.
What RISK? Did they break that Icelandic law and fire him after it died down?
Guess which side of that whole thing Darius Johnson was on.
Hint: It wasn't T20's side. |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
51
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 17:27:00 -
[11] - Quote
Darth Tickles wrote:Ya, going from crying about your space pixel datacores to making unsubstantiated attacks on someone's professional conduct is pretty ******* unhinged behaviour. At this point you really need to unplug and evaluate your life.
To the insane their own actions seem reasonable and appropriate while everyone else appears to be insane and unreasonable. |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
51
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 17:35:00 -
[12] - Quote
Sigurd Sig Hansen wrote:Darth Tickles wrote:Ya, going from crying about your space pixel datacores to making unsubstantiated attacks on someone's professional conduct is pretty ******* unhinged behaviour. At this point you really need to unplug and evaluate your life. Still think that unless we see massive unsubs nothing will change. See what they do not what they say seems in full effect unless you can point to where we've only said something and theyve scrapped it, unlike ppl leaving and we get a apology from Hilmar and a radical change in direction and refocusing on FiS instead of WiS?
Get all 100 people who really care about passive data core income to quit. Then we will see some real change. |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
51
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 17:39:00 -
[13] - Quote
Sigurd Sig Hansen wrote:Brooks Puuntai wrote:Sigurd Sig Hansen wrote:Brooks Puuntai wrote:I hope that people realize that while to us Eve is a game, to those who work at CCP its a job and what pays their bills. After T20 I highly doubt many Devs would risk going to great lengths to manipulate the game in their favor at the risk of their job.
What RISK? Did they break that Icelandic law and fire him after it died down? Its hard to know the reasoning without actually working at CCP or knowing their contracts or employee's code of conduct agreement. . Im using the excuse CCP GAVE USThat "icelandic law" thing? Yeah I didnt pull that from my ass. Brooks Puuntai wrote:but even still your missing the point. Obviously since it is a job to them and how they support themselves and/or their families its not worth the potential risk. Youre missing the point... what risk? And it WAS worth the risk before lol
Could you link us to this icelandic law? |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
51
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 17:43:00 -
[14] - Quote
Doctor Ungabungas wrote:Sigurd Sig Hansen wrote: Youre missing the point... what risk? And it WAS worth the risk before lol
The risk that they'd be dismissed for cause, not be able to get another job and be stuck in Iceland polishing walrus tusks until they die alone and forgotten. And sure, it was worth the risk before when there was no actual chance of getting caught and no mechanism in place for being fired if you were caught. But now there are both. Feels good man.
But the mechanism is run by teh goonies!!!1!!!1 |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
52
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 19:53:00 -
[15] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:If you are known, you get petitions answered faster. If I petition on Mr Epeen instead of one of my less known characters, it gets answered faster and is more likely actually read than auto-answered. So it stands to reason that if I had a name like 'The Mittani', for instance, anything I petition will be noticed almost immediately and jumped to the front of the queue. It's just the way people are. They are attracted to the familiar. GMs included. No tin foil. Just an observation on common human behavior. The tinfoil will come out when the sputtering denials start coming out in barred posts. Mr Epeen  You do realize that petitions are sorted into ques based on different categories before people even look at them right?  As soon as I hit post, I knew I would see this almost immediately. Of course I know. And of course I am not comparing apples and oranges. I am basing it on response times from my own experience when submitting similar claims on different characters. Mr Epeen 
I know I've had some petitions that are answered within a few minutes to a few hours, and I've had some petitions answered within a few weeks. It all depends on what it is filed under. It's just like calling in to a call center, if there isn't a huge queue you get to someone faster. |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
52
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 19:55:00 -
[16] - Quote
michael boltonIII wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:If you are known, you get petitions answered faster. If I petition on Mr Epeen instead of one of my less known characters, it gets answered faster and is more likely actually read than auto-answered. So it stands to reason that if I had a name like 'The Mittani', for instance, anything I petition will be noticed almost immediately and jumped to the front of the queue. It's just the way people are. They are attracted to the familiar. GMs included. No tin foil. Just an observation on common human behavior. The tinfoil will come out when the sputtering denials start coming out in barred posts. Mr Epeen  The shocking part is that nobody actually knows who you are.
He's a guy who personally signs each and every post with his name, so people can be sure it is him. |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
52
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 20:05:00 -
[17] - Quote
Wyke Mossari wrote:Earlier I named the wrong GM, that was an honest mistake of faulty memory on my part. I've removed the incorrect name from my original post and apologies unreservedly to the wrongly implicated GM. CCP Sreegs wrote:Quote: I especially like the 15 minute response time for Goon petitions.
Discussion of this case and the evidence presented is all over this forum.
The IA email address which has been linked repeatedly is the perfect place for this post. That is one issue where IA could have being pro-active would have settled any reasonable players concerns. All it would take would be to say something like Quote:This (will be/has been) investigated and there (is / is not) any connection between the Goons and GM who handled the petition and appropriate action has been/will be taken.
Well see, legally I'd imagine that issues such as this are private. the IA Dept may not even be able to acknowledge that there is an investigation going on. |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
53
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 20:36:00 -
[18] - Quote
arcca jeth wrote:I guess the question that would be nice for someone to answer is:
Are there any CCP employees that play the game that are NOT involved or associated with GOONS and if so, are they in a High-Sec only corp? Would they publicly admit or endorse that player corporation? Is there anyone within CCP who is anti-goon?
I'd have to say that most likely the answer to this is a big NO. Otherwise, you would have heard about it by now. I've never heard of a single accusation that DEVS are involved with any other corps or alliances other than the BOB stories from years ago.
Certainly there are other large alliances that are enemies of GOONS that could make for some great gameplay for the devs if they chose to fight against them. But that wouldn't happen because of the "watch the world burn" mentality that the GOONS have and I'm sure if the shoe was on the other foot, that they would protest the GM/DEV's involvement against them, and would might even try to pull a "everyone in the alliance threat to quit" card to get their way.
So really that's the lingering question. Why do the DEVs choose to get involved with GOONs rather than GOON enemies? And if there are, where are they? Why are they hiding in the shadows in regards to that but not the other way around?
Would a CCP Dev ever help a large alliance fight GOONs toward their final days?
Anyways, food for thought I guess.
Why do you throw this out when you don't have any evidence of it? |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
53
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 20:55:00 -
[19] - Quote
HVAC Repairman wrote:arcca jeth wrote:the evidence is there, it's called EVE history. They've done it in the past, what would keep them from doing it again? that's not evidence that's baseless speculation Baseless speculation based on past events.
It'd be like insisting that President Obama built secret internment camps for Japanese people because the US did it during World War II. |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
54
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 21:01:00 -
[20] - Quote
arcca jeth wrote:no, but they dedicated out of county prisons (detainment camps) for enemies of the U.S. which happen to be mostly arab/islamic extremists. Not copy and paste but maybe, copy/paste,edit for modern day acceptance
So basically you are agreeing with what I said. |

Andrey Wartooth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
54
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 21:03:00 -
[21] - Quote
Sigurd Sig Hansen wrote: Oh crap the Goons are disagreeing! Wait! Youre not allowed to have independant thoughts in the Hive!!
I was agreeing with him and adding my own thoughts to it. |
| |
|